On 07/05/20 16:44, Dave Hansen wrote: >> You could add a new option (X86_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS) which is >> def_bool X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS and avoiding the prompt line. >> Soo it is selected based on the old option and the user isn't bother. A >> few cycles later you could remove intel option and add prompt to other. >> But still little work for… > That does sound viable, if we decide it's all worth it. > > So, for now my preference would be to change the prompt, but leave the > CONFIG_ naming in place.
I agree. What's in a name? An Intel rose by any other name would smell as sweet. Oh wait... :) Paolo > If we decide that transitioning the config is > the right thing (I don't feel super strongly either way), let's use > Sebastian's trick to avoid the Kconfig prompts. >
