From: Arend Van Spriel <[email protected]>

commit 82bc9ab6a8f577d2174a736c33f3d4ecf7d9ef47 upstream.

When the host-interface bus has hard time handling transmit packets
it informs higher layer about this and it would stop the netdev
queue when needed. However, since commit 9cd18359d31e ("brcmfmac:
Make FWS queueing configurable.") this was broken. With this patch
the behaviour is restored.

Cc: [email protected] # v4.5, v4.6, v4.7
Fixes: 9cd18359d31e ("brcmfmac: Make FWS queueing configurable.")
Tested-by: Per Förlin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Franky Lin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwsignal.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwsignal.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwsignal.c
@@ -2262,10 +2262,22 @@ void brcmf_fws_bustxfail(struct brcmf_fw
 void brcmf_fws_bus_blocked(struct brcmf_pub *drvr, bool flow_blocked)
 {
        struct brcmf_fws_info *fws = drvr->fws;
+       struct brcmf_if *ifp;
+       int i;
 
-       fws->bus_flow_blocked = flow_blocked;
-       if (!flow_blocked)
-               brcmf_fws_schedule_deq(fws);
-       else
-               fws->stats.bus_flow_block++;
+       if (fws->avoid_queueing) {
+               for (i = 0; i < BRCMF_MAX_IFS; i++) {
+                       ifp = drvr->iflist[i];
+                       if (!ifp || !ifp->ndev)
+                               continue;
+                       brcmf_txflowblock_if(ifp, BRCMF_NETIF_STOP_REASON_FLOW,
+                                            flow_blocked);
+               }
+       } else {
+               fws->bus_flow_blocked = flow_blocked;
+               if (!flow_blocked)
+                       brcmf_fws_schedule_deq(fws);
+               else
+                       fws->stats.bus_flow_block++;
+       }
 }


Reply via email to