On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 10:47:04AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > And if you're calling it > > DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL > > then it seems like > > ARCH_DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL > > would be the logical name rather than RETTRAMP?
But that looses the TRAMP, and ARCH_DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL_TRAMP so damn long, then again, it's only 2 chars more than what I have now, sure, lets do it. > Still not crazy about static_cond_call(), though I think at least > changing it to static_call_cond() would be better for namespacing > reasons. Done.
