Move the handing of the point of no return from search_binary_handler
into __do_execve_file so that it is easier to find, and to keep
things robust in the face of change.

Make it clear that an existing fatal signal will take precedence over
a forced SIGSEGV by not forcing SIGSEGV if a fatal signal is already
pending.  This does not change the behavior but it saves a reader
of the code the tedium of reading and understanding force_sig
and the signal delivery code.

Update the comment in begin_new_exec about where SIGSEGV is forced.

Keep point_of_no_return from being a mystery by documenting
what the code is doing where it forces SIGSEGV if the
code is past the point of no return.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com>
---
 fs/exec.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 15682a1dfee9..443eb960f9a0 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1329,8 +1329,8 @@ int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
        /*
         * With the new mm installed it is completely impossible to
         * fail and return to the original process.  If anything from
-        * here on returns an error, the check in
-        * search_binary_handler() will SEGV current.
+        * here on returns an error, the check in __do_execve_file()
+        * will SEGV current.
         */
        bprm->point_of_no_return = true;
        bprm->mm = NULL;
@@ -1722,13 +1722,8 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 
                read_lock(&binfmt_lock);
                put_binfmt(fmt);
-               if (retval < 0 && bprm->point_of_no_return) {
-                       /* we got to flush_old_exec() and failed after it */
-                       read_unlock(&binfmt_lock);
-                       force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV);
-                       return retval;
-               }
-               if (retval != -ENOEXEC || !bprm->file) {
+               if (bprm->point_of_no_return || !bprm->file ||
+                   (retval != -ENOEXEC)) {
                        read_unlock(&binfmt_lock);
                        return retval;
                }
@@ -1899,6 +1894,14 @@ static int __do_execve_file(int fd, struct filename 
*filename,
        return retval;
 
 out:
+       /*
+        * If past the point of no return ensure the the code never
+        * returns to the userspace process.  Use an existing fatal
+        * signal if present otherwise terminate the process with
+        * SIGSEGV.
+        */
+       if (bprm->point_of_no_return && !fatal_signal_pending(current))
+               force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV);
        if (bprm->mm) {
                acct_arg_size(bprm, 0);
                mmput(bprm->mm);
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to