On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 18:48 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 9 May 2020 00:31:03 +0100 Colin Ian King wrote:
> > > My preference would be for
> > >
> > > {
> > > int i;
> > > u32 off = 0;
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < TG3_SD_NUM_RECS; i++) {
> > > tg3_ape_scratchpad_read(tp, (u32 *)ocir, off, TC3_OCIR_LEN);
> > >
> > > if (ocir->signature != TG3_OCIR_SIG_MAGIC ||
> > > !(ocir->version_flags & TG3_OCIR_FLAG_ACTIVE))
> > > memset(ocir, 0, TG3_OCIR_LEN);
> > >
> > > off += TG3_OCIR_LEN;
> > > ocir++;
> > > }
> > >
> > OK, I'll send a V3 tomorrow.
>
> I already reviewed and applied v2, just waiting for builds to finish,
> let's leave it.
I think clarity should be preferred.
Are you a maintainer of this file?
$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c
Siva Reddy Kallam <siva.kal...@broadcom.com> (supporter:BROADCOM TG3 GIGABIT
ETHERNET DRIVER)
Prashant Sreedharan <prash...@broadcom.com> (supporter:BROADCOM TG3 GIGABIT
ETHERNET DRIVER)
Michael Chan <mc...@broadcom.com> (supporter:BROADCOM TG3 GIGABIT ETHERNET
DRIVER)
"David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net> (odd fixer:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
net...@vger.kernel.org (open list:BROADCOM TG3 GIGABIT ETHERNET DRIVER)
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
