Hi Asutosh, Thanks for your review.
On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 11:12 -0700, Asutosh Das (asd) wrote: > On 5/8/2020 10:15 AM, Stanley Chu wrote: > > Allow flush threshold for WriteBooster to be customizable by > > vendors. To achieve this, make the value as a variable in struct > > ufs_hba first. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 6 ++++-- > > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > index cdacbe6378a1..9a0ce6550c2f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > > @@ -5301,8 +5301,8 @@ static bool > > ufshcd_wb_presrv_usrspc_keep_vcc_on(struct ufs_hba *hba, > > cur_buf); > > return false; > > } > > - /* Let it continue to flush when >60% full */ > > - if (avail_buf < UFS_WB_40_PERCENT_BUF_REMAIN) > > + /* Let it continue to flush when available buffer exceeds threshold */ > > + if (avail_buf < hba->vps->wb_flush_threshold) > > return true; > > > > return false; > > @@ -6839,6 +6839,7 @@ static void ufshcd_wb_probe(struct ufs_hba *hba, u8 > > *desc_buf) > > if (!d_lu_wb_buf_alloc) > > goto wb_disabled; > > } > > + > Is this newline needed? Oops, I will remove this in next version. > > > return; > > > > wb_disabled: > > @@ -7462,6 +7463,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group > > *ufshcd_driver_groups[] = { > > > > static struct ufs_hba_variant_params ufs_hba_vps = { > > .hba_enable_delay_us = 1000, > > + .wb_flush_threshold = UFS_WB_40_PERCENT_BUF_REMAIN, > > .devfreq_profile.polling_ms = 100, > > .devfreq_profile.target = ufshcd_devfreq_target, > > .devfreq_profile.get_dev_status = ufshcd_devfreq_get_dev_status, > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h > > index f7bdf52ba8b0..e3dfb48e669e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h > > @@ -570,6 +570,7 @@ struct ufs_hba_variant_params { > > struct devfreq_dev_profile devfreq_profile; > > struct devfreq_simple_ondemand_data ondemand_data; > > u16 hba_enable_delay_us; > > + u32 wb_flush_threshold; > > }; > > > > /** > > > > Patch[3] & [4] may be combined into a single patch perhaps? > Patch[4] just redoes what [3] did in a different way, so might as well > just do what patch[4] does right away. OK! I will try to merge both to a single patch in next version. Let me know if you have any other comments for the whole series. Thanks, Stanley Chu > >
