On Sat, 2020-05-09 at 11:13 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Sat, 9 May 2020 18:47:08 +0200 Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > Le 09/05/2020 à 03:54, Jakub Kicinski a écrit : > > > On Fri, 8 May 2020 19:25:57 +0200 Christophe JAILLET wrote: > > > > @@ -527,8 +531,9 @@ static int mac_sonic_platform_remove(struct > > > > platform_device *pdev) > > > > struct sonic_local* lp = netdev_priv(dev); > > > > > > > > unregister_netdev(dev); > > > > - dma_free_coherent(lp->device, SIZEOF_SONIC_DESC * > > > > SONIC_BUS_SCALE(lp->dma_bitmode), > > > > - lp->descriptors, lp->descriptors_laddr); > > > > + dma_free_coherent(lp->device, > > > > + SIZEOF_SONIC_DESC * > > > > SONIC_BUS_SCALE(lp->dma_bitmode), > > > > + lp->descriptors, lp->descriptors_laddr); > > > > free_netdev(dev); > > > > > > > > return 0; > > > This is a white-space only change, right? Since this is a fix we should > > > avoid making cleanups which are not strictly necessary. > > > > Right. > > > > The reason of this clean-up is that I wanted to avoid a checkpatch > > warning with the proposed patch and I felt that having the same layout > > in the error handling path of the probe function and in the remove > > function was clearer. > > So I updated also the remove function. > > I understand the motivation is good.
David, maybe I missed some notification about Jakub's role. What is Jakub's role in relation to the networking tree?
