On Fri 08-05-20 17:16:29, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Starting from v4.19 commit 29ef680ae7c2 ("memcg, oom: move out_of_memory
> back to the charge path") cgroup oom killer is no longer invoked only from
> page faults. Now it implements the same semantics as global OOM killer:
> allocation context invokes OOM killer and keeps retrying until success.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebni...@yandex-team.ru>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>

> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst |   17 ++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst 
> b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> index bcc80269bb6a..1bb9a8f6ebe1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> @@ -1172,6 +1172,13 @@ PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
>       Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit
>       temporarily.
>  
> +     In default configuration regular 0-order allocation always
> +     succeed unless OOM killer choose current task as a victim.
> +
> +     Some kinds of allocations don't invoke the OOM killer.
> +     Caller could retry them differently, return into userspace
> +     as -ENOMEM or silently ignore in cases like disk readahead.

I would probably add -EFAULT but the less error codes we document the
better.

> +
>       This is the ultimate protection mechanism.  As long as the
>       high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's
>       utility is limited to providing the final safety net.
> @@ -1228,17 +1235,9 @@ PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
>               The number of time the cgroup's memory usage was
>               reached the limit and allocation was about to fail.
>  
> -             Depending on context result could be invocation of OOM
> -             killer and retrying allocation or failing allocation.
> -
> -             Failed allocation in its turn could be returned into
> -             userspace as -ENOMEM or silently ignored in cases like
> -             disk readahead.  For now OOM in memory cgroup kills
> -             tasks iff shortage has happened inside page fault.
> -
>               This event is not raised if the OOM killer is not
>               considered as an option, e.g. for failed high-order
> -             allocations.
> +             allocations or if caller asked to not retry attempts.
>  
>         oom_kill
>               The number of processes belonging to this cgroup

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to