On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:42:10AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> \From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <[email protected]>
> 
> A bug report was posted that running the preempt irq delay module on a slow
> machine, and removing it quickly could lead to the thread created by the
> modlue to execute after the module is removed, and this could cause the
> kernel to crash. The fix for this was to call kthread_stop() after creating
> the thread to make sure it finishes before allowing the module to be
> removed.
> 
> Now this caused the opposite problem on fast machines. What now happens is
> the kthread_stop() can cause the kthread never to execute and the test never
> to run. To fix this, add a completion and wait for the kthread to execute,
> then wait for it to end.
> 
> This issue caused the ftracetest selftests to fail on the preemptirq tests.
> 
> Cc: [email protected]
> Fixes: d16a8c31077e ("tracing: Wait for preempt irq delay thread to finish")

Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]>

thanks,

 - Joel


> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/preemptirq_delay_test.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/preemptirq_delay_test.c 
> b/kernel/trace/preemptirq_delay_test.c
> index c4c86de63cf9..312d1a0ca3b6 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/preemptirq_delay_test.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/preemptirq_delay_test.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/printk.h>
>  #include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> +#include <linux/completion.h>
>  
>  static ulong delay = 100;
>  static char test_mode[12] = "irq";
> @@ -28,6 +29,8 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(delay, "Period in microseconds (100 us 
> default)");
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(test_mode, "Mode of the test such as preempt, irq, or 
> alternate (default irq)");
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(burst_size, "The size of a burst (default 1)");
>  
> +static struct completion done;
> +
>  #define MIN(x, y) ((x) < (y) ? (x) : (y))
>  
>  static void busy_wait(ulong time)
> @@ -114,6 +117,8 @@ static int preemptirq_delay_run(void *data)
>       for (i = 0; i < s; i++)
>               (testfuncs[i])(i);
>  
> +     complete(&done);
> +
>       set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>       while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
>               schedule();
> @@ -128,15 +133,18 @@ static int preemptirq_delay_run(void *data)
>  static int preemptirq_run_test(void)
>  {
>       struct task_struct *task;
> -
>       char task_name[50];
>  
> +     init_completion(&done);
> +
>       snprintf(task_name, sizeof(task_name), "%s_test", test_mode);
>       task =  kthread_run(preemptirq_delay_run, NULL, task_name);
>       if (IS_ERR(task))
>               return PTR_ERR(task);
> -     if (task)
> +     if (task) {
> +             wait_for_completion(&done);
>               kthread_stop(task);
> +     }
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

Reply via email to