[PATCH -tip V6 1/6] kprobes: Suppress the suspicious RCU warning on kprobes

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Anders reported that the lockdep warns that suspicious
RCU list usage in register_kprobe() (detected by
CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST.) This is because get_kprobe()
access kprobe_table[] by hlist_for_each_entry_rcu()
without rcu_read_lock.

If we call get_kprobe() from the breakpoint handler context,
it is run with preempt disabled, so this is not a problem.
But in other cases, instead of rcu_read_lock(), we locks
kprobe_mutex so that the kprobe_table[] is not updated.
So, current code is safe, but still not good from the view
point of RCU.

Joel suggested that we can silent that warning by passing
lockdep_is_held() to the last argument of
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu().

Add lockdep_is_held(&kprobe_mutex) at the end of the
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() to suppress the warning.

Reported-by: Anders Roxell <anders.rox...@linaro.org>
Suggested-by: Joel Fernandes <j...@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <j...@joelfernandes.org>
---
 kernel/kprobes.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 2625c241ac00..bd484392d789 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -326,7 +326,8 @@ struct kprobe *get_kprobe(void *addr)
        struct kprobe *p;
 
        head = &kprobe_table[hash_ptr(addr, KPROBE_HASH_BITS)];
-       hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(p, head, hlist) {
+       hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(p, head, hlist,
+                                lockdep_is_held(&kprobe_mutex)) {
                if (p->addr == addr)
                        return p;
        }