If left plain, using __READ_ONCE and __WRITE_ONCE will result in many
false positives with KCSAN due to being instrumented normally. To fix,
we should move the kcsan_check and data_race into __*_ONCE.

Cc: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <el...@google.com>
---
A proposal to fix the problem with __READ_ONCE/__WRITE_ONCE and KCSAN
false positives.

Will, please feel free to take this patch and fiddle with it until it
looks like what you want if this is completely off.

Note: Currently __WRITE_ONCE_SCALAR seems to serve no real purpose. Do
we still need it?
---
 include/linux/compiler.h | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index 741c93c62ecf..e902ca5de811 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -224,13 +224,16 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, 
int val,
  * atomicity or dependency ordering guarantees. Note that this may result
  * in tears!
  */
-#define __READ_ONCE(x) (*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x))
+#define __READ_ONCE(x)                                                 \
+({                                                                     \
+       kcsan_check_atomic_read(&(x), sizeof(x));                       \
+       data_race((*(const volatile __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) *)&(x))); \
+})
 
 #define __READ_ONCE_SCALAR(x)                                          \
 ({                                                                     \
        typeof(x) *__xp = &(x);                                         \
-       __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) __x = data_race(__READ_ONCE(*__xp));  \
-       kcsan_check_atomic_read(__xp, sizeof(*__xp));                   \
+       __unqual_scalar_typeof(x) __x = __READ_ONCE(*__xp);             \
        smp_read_barrier_depends();                                     \
        (typeof(x))__x;                                                 \
 })
@@ -243,14 +246,14 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_likely_data *f, 
int val,
 
 #define __WRITE_ONCE(x, val)                                           \
 do {                                                                   \
-       *(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x) = (val);                            \
+       kcsan_check_atomic_write(&(x), sizeof(x));                      \
+       data_race(*(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x) = (val));                 \
 } while (0)
 
 #define __WRITE_ONCE_SCALAR(x, val)                                    \
 do {                                                                   \
        typeof(x) *__xp = &(x);                                         \
-       kcsan_check_atomic_write(__xp, sizeof(*__xp));                  \
-       data_race(({ __WRITE_ONCE(*__xp, val); 0; }));                  \
+       __WRITE_ONCE(*__xp, val);                                       \
 } while (0)
 
 #define WRITE_ONCE(x, val)                                             \
-- 
2.26.2.645.ge9eca65c58-goog

Reply via email to