On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Matthias Juchem wrote: > On 6 Jan 2001, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > > > This is wrong. You cannot execute libc.so.5. This only works with > > glibc. > > I already thought of something like that (I was not able to test it...). > Can you tell me a reliable way to get the version other than just looking > for the version appended to the file name? > Or is the file name scheme reliable (/lib/libc.so.5.x.y)? > Taking a guess here.... strings /lib/libc* | grep "release version" I'm not sure how reliable this method is either :) / Brett - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] new bug report script Matthias Juchem
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Matthias Juchem
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Paul Gortmaker
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Matthias Juchem
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Brett
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Matthias Juchem
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script David Ford
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Kurt Roeckx
- [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Matthias Juchem
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] new bug report sc... Matthias Juchem
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] new bug report sc... Matthias Juchem
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Matthias Juchem
- Re: [PATCH] new bug report script Alan Cox