From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>

[ Upstream commit df4953e4e997e273501339f607b77953772e3559 ]

syzbot managed to set up sfq so that q->scaled_quantum was zero,
triggering an infinite loop in sfq_dequeue()

More generally, we must only accept quantum between 1 and 2^18 - 7,
meaning scaled_quantum must be in [1, 0x7FFF] range.

Otherwise, we also could have a loop in sfq_dequeue()
if scaled_quantum happens to be 0x8000, since slot->allot
could indefinitely switch between 0 and 0x8000.

Fixes: eeaeb068f139 ("sch_sfq: allow big packets and be fair")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+0251e883fe39e7a0c...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/sched/sch_sfq.c |    9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

--- a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
@@ -641,6 +641,15 @@ static int sfq_change(struct Qdisc *sch,
        if (ctl->divisor &&
            (!is_power_of_2(ctl->divisor) || ctl->divisor > 65536))
                return -EINVAL;
+
+       /* slot->allot is a short, make sure quantum is not too big. */
+       if (ctl->quantum) {
+               unsigned int scaled = SFQ_ALLOT_SIZE(ctl->quantum);
+
+               if (scaled <= 0 || scaled > SHRT_MAX)
+                       return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
        if (ctl_v1 && !red_check_params(ctl_v1->qth_min, ctl_v1->qth_max,
                                        ctl_v1->Wlog))
                return -EINVAL;


Reply via email to