On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:59:42 -0600 Jonathan Corbet wrote:

> Here's a new version of the patch-tags document.  I've incorporated
> comments from Randy Dunlap, Stefan Richter, and Neil Brown, though I
> have retained, for now, the more verbose process discussion that Neil
> didn't like.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> jon
> 
> --
> 
> Document the tags used with kernel patches
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/patch-tags b/Documentation/patch-tags
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d955fa2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/patch-tags
> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> +Patches headed for the mainline may contain a variety of tags documenting
> +who played a hand in (or was at least aware of) its progress.  All of these

        s/its/their/

> +tags have the form:
> +
> +     Something-done-by: Full name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [optional random stuff]
> +
> +These tags are:
> +

[snip]

> +Tested-by:   The patch has been successfully tested (in some
> +             environment) by the person named.  This tag informs
> +             maintainers that some testing has been performed and
> +             ensures credit for the testers.

?:      and provides a means to locate testers for future patches.

> +
> +
> +----
> +
> +Reviewer's statement of oversight, v0.02

[snip]

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to