On Oct 10 2007 14:36, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >> >> --- linux-2.6.23/include/linux/mm.h.vanilla >> >> +++ linux-2.6.23/include/linux/mm.h >> > >> >> +struct super_block; >> >> extern void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *); >> >> void drop_pagecache(void); >> >> void drop_slab(void); >> >> >> >> You probably end up fixing it some other way, but as I do not know this >> >> file inside out I just wanted to drop a note. >> > >> > You have some strange vanilla kernel. 2.6.23 doesn't have this prototype. >> >> The same happens here as well. >> >> -rw-rw-r-- 1 mjt mjt 45488158 Oct 9 20:48 linux-2.6.23.tar.bz2 >> 2cc2fd4d521dc5d7cfce0d8a9d1b3472 linux-2.6.23.tar.bz2 >> >> (timestamp is in UTC) Downloaded yesterday, 3 hours after an announce, >> from http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.23.tar.bz2 . > >Strange. Same size, same md5, no super_block in mm.h, though
Does someone still have the broken tarball? There has not been any drop_pagecache_sb anytime between 2.6.23-rc1 and 2.6.23. drop_pagecache_sb reminds me of reiser4, too. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/