On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:01:41AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2020 15:45:58 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 07:03:33AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >> On Thu, 14 May 2020 10:16:56 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:46:18AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:39:03AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >>>>> From 96fa6680e3b990633ecbb6d11acf03a161b790bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>>>> From: Akira Yokosawa <aki...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 15:12:57 +0900
> >>>>> Subject: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] Documentation/litmus-tests: Merge atomic's
> >>>>> README into top-level one
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Where Documentation/litmus-tests/README lists RCU litmus tests,
> >>>>> Documentation/litmus-tests/atomic/README lists atomic litmus tests.
> >>>>> For symmetry, merge the latter into former, with some context
> >>>>> adjustment in the introduction.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <aki...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.and...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <j...@joelfernandes.org>
> >>>>
> >>>> Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.f...@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Applied, and thank you all!
> >>>
> >>> I rebased, cancelling the revert with the original, resulting in an
> >>> updated lkmm branch on -rcu. There was one minor conflict, so could
> >>> one of you please check to make sure that I resolved things appropriately?
> >>
> >> One thing I noticed.
> >>
> >> Commit b2998782ded4 ("Documentation/litmus-tests: Clarify about the RCU
> >> pre-initialization test")'s change log says:
> >>
> >> Since this test returned to tools/memory-model/, make sure that it is
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> at least referenced from Documentation/litmus-tests/'s README.
> >>
> >> Because of the rebase, this needs amendment as well as the title.
> >>
> >> Something like
> >>
> >> Documentation/litumus-tests: Cite a relevant litmus test in
> >> tools/memory-model
> >>
> >> For ease of finding the RCU related litmus test under
> >> tools/memory-model/, add an entry in README.
> >>
> >> ?
> >
> > Good catch, and yes, I will update that on the next rebase.
> >
> > Any other things in need of adjustment?
>
> Aside from the missing Signed-off-by tags Stephen pointed out, I don't
> see anything.
Yeah, I did mess that up! ;-)
Thank you for checking!!!
Thanx, Paul
