On 5/15/20 6:02 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the > content is safe > > Hi, > > On 15/05/2020 14:16:24+0300, cristian.bir...@microchip.com wrote: >> From: Cristian Birsan <cristian.bir...@microchip.com> >> >> This patch set adds usb device support for SAM9x60 SoC. >> The DPRAM memory for the USB High Speed Device Port (UDPHS) hardware >> block was increased and the allocation method is changed. This patch >> series simplifies the endpoint allocation scheme to acomodate this SoC >> and the old ones. >> >> Changes in v2: >> - drop the patch that adds reference to pmc for sam9x60 >> - use dt-bindings: usb prefix >> - enable usb device in device tree >> >> Claudiu Beznea (1): >> usb: gadget: udc: atmel: use of_find_matching_node_and_match >> >> Cristian Birsan (6): >> dt-bindings: usb: atmel: Update DT bindings documentation for sam9x60 >> usb: gadget: udc: atmel: simplify endpoint allocation >> usb: gadget: udc: atmel: use 1 bank endpoints for control transfers >> usb: gadget: udc: atmel: rename errata into caps >> usb: gadget: udc: atmel: update endpoint allocation for sam9x60 >> ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60ek: enable usb device > > This should probably be rebased on top of > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200507155651.1094142-1-gregory.clem...@bootlin.com/ > so we avoid having to define the endpoints in the device tree in the > first place.
I know the patch series and I Ack-ed it some time ago. On the other hand, it was not applied yet, so to be consistent I created this series based on what is already available on usb-next. Depending on which one gets applied first, the other will need to rebase. I have no problem with that. The end goal is to have both of them. Cristian > > -- > Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com >
