16.05.2020 18:51, Randy Dunlap пишет: > On 5/16/20 8:36 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> diff --git a/block/partitions/efi.c b/block/partitions/efi.c >> index b64bfdd4326c..3af4660bc11f 100644 >> --- a/block/partitions/efi.c >> +++ b/block/partitions/efi.c >> @@ -621,6 +621,14 @@ static int find_valid_gpt(struct parsed_partitions >> *state, gpt_header **gpt, >> if (!good_agpt && force_gpt) >> good_agpt = is_gpt_valid(state, lastlba, &agpt, &aptes); >> >> + /* The force_gpt_sector is used by NVIDIA Tegra partition parser in >> + * order to convey a non-standard location of the GPT entry for lookup. >> + * By default force_gpt_sector is set to 0 and has no effect. >> + */ > > Please fix the multi-line comment format as described in > Documentation/process/coding-style.rst. > >> + if (!good_agpt && force_gpt && state->force_gpt_sector) >> + good_agpt = is_gpt_valid(state, state->force_gpt_sector, >> + &agpt, &aptes); >> + >> /* The obviously unsuccessful case */ >> if (!good_pgpt && !good_agpt) >> goto fail; > > thanks. >
Hello Randy, I know that it's not a proper kernel-style formatting, but that's the style used by the whole efi.c source code and I wanted to maintain the same style, for consistency. Of course I can change to a proper style if it's more desirable than the consistency. Thank you for the comment!
