On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 10:56:23AM -0500, jamal wrote: [snip] > > I used to be against VLANS being devices, i am withdrawing that comment; it's > a lot easier to look on them as devices if you want to run IP on them. And > in this case, it makes sense the possibilirt of over a thousand devices > is good. > Glad to hear :) So perhaps this is a good time to move one of VLAN implementations into the official kernel? -- Gleb. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT ... Ben Greear
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT ... David S. Miller
- [little bit OT] ip _IS_ _NOT_ ifconfig ... Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: [little bit OT] ip _IS_ _NOT_ i... David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does ... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does ... jamal
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (D... Gleb Natapov
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (D... Ben Greear
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet ... Ben Greear
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does ... Ben Greear
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (D... Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (N... Ben Greear
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device looku... David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device ... Ben Greear
- Re: [PATCH] hashed device ... Andi Kleen