From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:24:58 -0700
> Not sure why this crept in with hard-header-ops change.
> Just kill it. Need to start doing cross-compiles for s390...
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_main.c 2007-10-10 08:26:48.000000000 -0700
> +++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_main.c 2007-10-11 13:21:17.000000000 -0700
> @@ -6581,9 +6581,6 @@ qeth_hard_header_parse(const struct sk_b
> const struct qeth_card *card;
> const struct ethhdr *eth;
>
> - if (dev->type != ARPHRD_IEEE802_TR)
> - return 0;
> -
> card = qeth_get_card_from_dev(skb->dev);
> if (card->options.layer2)
> goto haveheader;
Stephen this change is not right.
In order to preserve the semantics that existed before your
headerops changes, this test must be there. From the original
qeth_main.c code:
if (qeth_get_netdev_flags(card) & IFF_NOARP) {
dev->rebuild_header = NULL;
dev->hard_header = NULL;
dev->header_cache_update = NULL;
dev->hard_header_cache = NULL;
}
...
if (card->options.fake_ll &&
(qeth_get_netdev_flags(card) & IFF_NOARP))
dev->hard_header = qeth_fake_header;
if (dev->type == ARPHRD_IEEE802_TR)
dev->hard_header_parse = NULL;
else
dev->hard_header_parse = qeth_hard_header_parse;
With the way you set up headerops in the driver, the only way
to preserve the ARPHRD_IEEE802_TR guard, is to keep the
test that you added to qeth_hard_header_parse().
Andrew, please go back to using the first patch you wrote to
fix the build, alternative resync with net-2.6.git as that
version of the build fix is there too.
Thans.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
