On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:28 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer
<tsbog...@alpha.franken.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:19:49AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 8:50 AM Thomas Bogendoerfer
> > <tsbog...@alpha.franken.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:22:30PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> > > > Add missing include which adds the prototype to plat_time_init().
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: f932449c11da ("MIPS: ingenic: Drop obsolete code, merge the rest
> > > > in setup.c")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <p...@crapouillou.net>
> > > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/mips/jz4740/setup.c | 1 +
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > applied to mips-next.
> >
> > Since mips-next is not merged, can you simply squash the fix to the
> > incomplete f932449c11da please?
>
> no, I don't rebase mips-next.
OK. I had the understanding that mips-fixes was the stable branch not rebased,
and mips-next was not considered stable until merged in mainstream.
I took note of the changes, thanks.
>
> Thomas.
>
> --
> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
> good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
