On (20/05/15 18:02), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2020-04-15 20:00:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > It is a logical continuation of previously applied %ptR for struct rtc_time.
> > We have few users of time64_t that would like to print it.
>
> It seems that everything was explained and the patches look good to
> me. If we allowed %ptR then it makes sense to allow %ptT as well.
>
> For all three patches:
>
> Rewieved-by: Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.com>
Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhat...@gmail.com>
-ss
