On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:02:26PM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote: > On 2020/5/20 11:31, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 19 May 2020 11:31:07 +0800 Xiaoming Ni <nixiaom...@huawei.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Kernel/sysctl.c > > > > eek! > > > > > > > > fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 2 +- > > > include/linux/sched/sysctl.h | 14 +-- > > > include/linux/sysctl.h | 13 ++- > > > kernel/hung_task.c | 77 +++++++++++++++- > > > kernel/sysctl.c | 214 > > > +++++++------------------------------------ > > > kernel/watchdog.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 6 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 197 deletions(-) > > > > Here's what we presently have happening in linux-next's kernel/sysctl.c: > > > > sysctl.c | 3109 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 1521 insertions(+), 1588 deletions(-) > > > > > > So this is not a good time for your patch! > > > > Can I suggest that you set the idea aside and take a look after 5.8-rc1 > > is released? > > > > ok, I will make v5 patch based on 5.8-rc1 after 5.8-rc1 is released, > And add more sysctl table cleanup.
Xiaoming, I'll coordinate with you on this offline as I have the fs kernel/sysctl.c stuff out of the way as well. Luis
