On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 08:30:57PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:48:26PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:38:27PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:12:01PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > > Since you don't like the way I initially fixed it, suppose there we
> > > > don't have
> > > > another way but to introduce something like
> > > > CONFIG_MIPS_CPS_NS16550_WIDTH
> > > > parameter to select a proper accessors, like sw in our case, and sb by
> > > > defaul).
> > > > Right?
> > >
> > > to be on the safe side it's probably the best thing. But I don't know
> > > enough about CPS_NS16550 to judge whether shift value correlates with
> > > possible access width.
> >
> > The base address passed to the _mips_cps_putc() leaf is UART-base address.
> > It
> > has nothing to do with CPS. See:
>
> ok, I'm confused. So this isn't an uart inside CPS hardware, but an uart used
> by CPS code for debug output, right ?
Right. It's not CPS, but just UART available on the system. See a comment in the
arch/mips/kernel/cps-vec-ns16550.S:
/**
* mips_cps_bev_dump() - dump relevant exception state to UART
* @a0: pointer to NULL-terminated ASCII string naming the exception
*
* Write information that may be useful in debugging an exception to the
* UART configured by CONFIG_MIPS_CPS_NS16550_*.
*...
*/
LEAF(mips_cps_bev_dump)
move s0, ra
move s1, a0
li t9, CKSEG1ADDR(CONFIG_MIPS_CPS_NS16550_BASE)
...
See the base is just loaded to the t9 register.
>
> To solve the issued please add CONFIG_MIPS_CPS_NS16550_WIDTH to select the
> correct access width.
Ok. Thanks.
-Sergey
>
> Thomas.
>
> --
> Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
> good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
