> -----Original Message----- > From: Vinod Koul <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 12:37 PM > To: Liao, Bard <[email protected]> > Cc: Bard Liao <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; pierre- > [email protected]; Kale, Sanyog R <[email protected]>; > Blauciak, Slawomir <[email protected]>; Lin, Mengdong > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] soundwire: intel: transition to 3 steps > initialization > > On 21-05-20, 02:23, Liao, Bard wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Vinod Koul <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 9:54 PM > > > To: Bard Liao <[email protected]> > > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; pierre- [email protected]; Kale, > > > Sanyog R <[email protected]>; Blauciak, Slawomir > > > <[email protected]>; Lin, Mengdong > > > <[email protected]>; Liao, Bard <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] soundwire: intel: transition to 3 steps > > > initialization > > > > > > On 20-05-20, 03:19, Bard Liao wrote: > > > > From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Rather than a plain-vanilla init/exit, this patch provides 3 steps > > > > in the initialization (ACPI scan, probe, startup) which makes it > > > > easier to detect platform support for SoundWire, allocate required > > > > resources as early as possible, and conversely help make the > > > > startup() callback lighter-weight with only hardware register setup. > > > > > > Okay but can you add details in changelog on what each step would do? > > > > Sure. Will do. > > > > > > > > > @@ -1134,25 +1142,15 @@ static int intel_probe(struct > > > > platform_device > > > *pdev) > > > > > > > > intel_pdi_ch_update(sdw); > > > > > > > > - /* Acquire IRQ */ > > > > - ret = request_threaded_irq(sdw->link_res->irq, > > > > - sdw_cdns_irq, sdw_cdns_thread, > > > > - IRQF_SHARED, KBUILD_MODNAME, &sdw- > > > >cdns); > > > > > > This is removed here but not added anywhere else, do we have no irq > > > after this patch? > > > > We use a single irq for all Intel Audio DSP events and it will be > > requested in the SOF driver. > > And how will the irq be propagated to sdw/cdns drivers here?
We export the handler and call it on SOF driver. > > -- > ~Vinod
