On 5/17/20 6:20 PM, [email protected] wrote: > From: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]> > > There is a user who do not want to use CMA memory for migration. Until > now, it is implemented by caller side but it's not optimal since there > is limited information on caller. This patch implements it on callee side > to get better result. > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]>
Thank you! Avoiding CMA works much better with this new skip_cma field. Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <[email protected]> -- Mike Kravetz
