Hi Uwe,

Le dim. 24 mai 2020 à 19:37, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de> a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 02:14:45PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
The PWM hardware in the JZ4725B works the same as in the JZ4740, but has
 only six channels available.

 Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <p...@crapouillou.net>
 ---

 Notes:
     I did not add documentation for the new jz4725b-pwm compatible
     string on purpose. The reason is that the documentation file
     for the Timer/Counter Unit (TCU) of Ingenic SoCs will be
     completely rewritten from .txt to YAML in a separate patchset.

  drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

 diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
 index f566f9d248d6..bb27934fb6c2 100644
 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
 +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
 @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@

  #define NUM_PWM 8

 +struct soc_info {
 +      unsigned int num_pwms;
 +};
 +
  struct jz4740_pwm_chip {
        struct pwm_chip chip;
        struct regmap *map;
@@ -36,7 +40,7 @@ static bool jz4740_pwm_can_use_chn(struct jz4740_pwm_chip *jz,
                                   unsigned int channel)
  {
/* Enable all TCU channels for PWM use by default except channels 0/1 */
 -      u32 pwm_channels_mask = GENMASK(NUM_PWM - 1, 2);
 +      u32 pwm_channels_mask = GENMASK(jz->chip.npwm - 1, 2);

        device_property_read_u32(jz->chip.dev->parent,
                                 "ingenic,pwm-channels-mask",
@@ -214,6 +218,7 @@ static int jz4740_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
        struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
        struct jz4740_pwm_chip *jz4740;
 +      const struct soc_info *info = device_get_match_data(dev);

        jz4740 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*jz4740), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!jz4740)
@@ -227,8 +232,8 @@ static int jz4740_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

        jz4740->chip.dev = dev;
        jz4740->chip.ops = &jz4740_pwm_ops;
 -      jz4740->chip.npwm = NUM_PWM;
        jz4740->chip.base = -1;
 +      jz4740->chip.npwm = info ? info->num_pwms : NUM_PWM;

Can info be actually NULL? I don't think so, so you can just use
info->num_pwms here and drop the definition of NUM_PWM.

In *theory* it can be NULL if the kernel is configured without CONFIG_OF, which will never happen on any board supported by this driver. I can add a dependency on CONFIG_OF in V2, then use info->num_pwms there.

cheers,
-Paul

        jz4740->chip.of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
        jz4740->chip.of_pwm_n_cells = 3;


Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |


Reply via email to