On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 02:18:26PM +0000, guo...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guo...@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> Obviously, there is no need to recover a0-a7 in reject path.
> 
> Previous modification is from commit af33d243 by Tycho, to
> fixup seccomp reject syscall code path.

Doesn't this suffer from the same problem, though? a7 is clobbered, so
the -ERESTARTSYS behavior won't work?

I haven't run the test case that was failing before.

Tycho

Reply via email to