[ + akpm ]
Daniel Axtens <d...@axtens.net> writes:
>>> > Check if alloc_percpu returns NULL.
>>> >
>>> > This was found by syzkaller both on x86 and powerpc, and the reproducer
>>> > it found on powerpc is capable of hitting the issue as an unprivileged
>>> > user.
>>> >
>>> > Fixes: 017c59c042d0 ("relay: Use per CPU constructs for the relay channel
>>> > buffer pointers")
>>> > Reported-by: syzbot+1e925b4b836afe85a...@syzkaller-ppc64.appspotmail.com
>>> > Reported-by: syzbot+587b2421926808309...@syzkaller-ppc64.appspotmail.com
>>> > Reported-by: syzbot+58320b7171734bf79...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>>> > Reported-by: syzbot+d6074fb08bdb2e010...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>>> > Cc: Akash Goel <akash.g...@intel.com>
>>> > Cc: Andrew Donnellan <a...@linux.ibm.com> # syzkaller-ppc64
>>> > Reviewed-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
>>> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <a...@linux.ibm.com>
>>> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v4.10+
>>> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <d...@axtens.net>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
>>
>> It looks this one was never applied (which relates to CVE-2019-19462,
>> as pointed by Guenter in 20191223163610.ga32...@roeck-us.net).
>>
>> Whas this lost or are there any issues pending?
>
> I'm not aware of any pending issues.
>
> (But, if anyone does have any objections I'm happy to revise the patch.)
It looks like kernel/relay.c is lacking a maintainer?
Andrew are you able to pick this up for v5.8? It's pretty obviously
correct, and has David's ack.
Original is here if that helps:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191219121256.26480-1-...@axtens.net/
cheers
