On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:07:35PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git 
> dev.2020.05.25a
> head:   1e9451642683146552713c5ce6d269ae378eacd5
> commit: 786a25497743696d79592b864cafbfe48787e6e1 [51/63] refperf: Add a test 
> to measure performance of read-side synchronization
> config: x86_64-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 11.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 
> 3393cc4cebf9969db94dc424b7a2b6195589c33b)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget 
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O 
> ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # install x86_64 cross compiling tool for clang build
>         # apt-get install binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu
>         git checkout 786a25497743696d79592b864cafbfe48787e6e1
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross 
> ARCH=x86_64 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
> 
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
> 
> >> kernel/rcu/refperf.c:298:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 
> >> 'reset_readers' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> void reset_readers(int n)
> ^
> kernel/rcu/refperf.c:298:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not 
> intended to be used outside of this translation unit
> void reset_readers(int n)
> ^
> static
> >> kernel/rcu/refperf.c:311:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 
> >> 'process_durations' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> u64 process_durations(int n)
> ^
> kernel/rcu/refperf.c:311:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not 
> intended to be used outside of this translation unit
> u64 process_durations(int n)
> ^
> static
> 2 warnings generated.

Good catches, fixing!

                                                        Thanx, Paul

> vim +/reset_readers +298 kernel/rcu/refperf.c
> 
>    297        
>  > 298        void reset_readers(int n)
>    299        {
>    300                int i;
>    301                struct reader_task *rt;
>    302        
>    303                for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
>    304                        rt = &(reader_tasks[i]);
>    305        
>    306                        rt->last_duration_ns = 0;
>    307                }
>    308        }
>    309        
>    310        // Print the results of each reader and return the sum of all 
> their durations.
>  > 311        u64 process_durations(int n)
>    312        {
>    313                int i;
>    314                struct reader_task *rt;
>    315                char buf1[64];
>    316                char buf[512];
>    317                u64 sum = 0;
>    318        
>    319                buf[0] = 0;
>    320                sprintf(buf, "Experiment #%d (Format: 
> <THREAD-NUM>:<Total loop time in ns>)",
>    321                        exp_idx);
>    322        
>    323                for (i = 0; i <= n && !torture_must_stop(); i++) {
>    324                        rt = &(reader_tasks[i]);
>    325                        sprintf(buf1, "%d: %llu\t", i, 
> rt->last_duration_ns);
>    326        
>    327                        if (i % 5 == 0)
>    328                                strcat(buf, "\n");
>    329                        strcat(buf, buf1);
>    330        
>    331                        sum += rt->last_duration_ns;
>    332                }
>    333                strcat(buf, "\n");
>    334        
>    335                PERFOUT("%s\n", buf);
>    336        
>    337                return sum;
>    338        }
>    339        
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-...@lists.01.org


Reply via email to