On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:01:26PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On 5/21/20 5:22 AM, Serge Semin wrote: > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:16:14PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > > > On 5/10/20 12:50 PM, Serge Semin wrote: > > > > Currently Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore is a feature of the DW APB I2C > > > > platform driver. It's a bit confusing to see it's config in the menu at > > > > some separated place with no reference to the platform code. Lets move > > > > the > > > > config definition under the if-I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM clause. By doing > > > > so > > > > the config menu will display the feature right below the DW I2C platform > > > > driver item and will indent it to the right so signifying its belonging. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: Alexey Malahov <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: Paul Burton <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: Rob Herring <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: Frank Rowand <[email protected]> > > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > --- > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 30 +++++++++++++++++------------- > > > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig > > > > index 368aa64e9266..ed6927c4c540 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig > > > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig > > > > @@ -530,8 +530,8 @@ config I2C_DESIGNWARE_CORE > > > > config I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM > > > > tristate "Synopsys DesignWare Platform" > > > > - select I2C_DESIGNWARE_CORE > > > > depends on (ACPI && COMMON_CLK) || !ACPI > > > > + select I2C_DESIGNWARE_CORE > > > > help > > > > If you say yes to this option, support will be included for > > > > the > > > > Synopsys DesignWare I2C adapter. > > > > @@ -539,6 +539,22 @@ config I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM > > > > This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module > > > > will be called i2c-designware-platform. > > > > +if I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM > > > > + > > > > +config I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL > > > > + bool "Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore support" > > > > + depends on ACPI > > > > + depends on (I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=m && IOSF_MBI) || \ > > > > + (I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y && IOSF_MBI=y) > > > > + help > > > > + This driver enables managed host access to the PMIC I2C bus > > > > on select > > > > + Intel BayTrail platforms using the X-Powers AXP288 PMIC. It > > > > allows > > > > + the host to request uninterrupted access to the PMIC's I2C > > > > bus from > > > > + the platform firmware controlling it. You should say Y if > > > > running on > > > > + a BayTrail system using the AXP288. > > > > + > > > > +endif # I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM > > > > + > > > > > > Is the added "if I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM" needed here? Should the "depends > > > on" be enough? > > > > The idea was to add if-endif clause here for features possibly added > > sometime > > in future. But using normal "depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM" shall make > > the config depicted as an indented sub-config as well. Would you like me to > > remove the if-clause and use the depends on operator instead? > > > Yes, please remove it from this patch. Keeps this patch simpler and if some > future feature needs it then that patch(set) is the right place to add it.
Agreed. I'll do this in v3. -Sergey > > Jarkko
