>
> this change doesn't seem quite right, if you look the code below there
> is no PM imbalance, is there?
>
> int sst_pm_runtime_put(struct intel_sst_drv *sst_drv)
> {
> int ret;
>
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(sst_drv->dev);
> ret = pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(sst_drv->dev);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> return 0;
> }You are right. Thank you for your correction! Regards, Dinghao
