On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 07:11:17AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:21:41AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > On 28.05.20 07:51, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > > On 26. 05. 20, 20:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > > > > > > > > [ Upstream commit 835a6a649d0dd1b1f46759eb60fff2f63ed253a7 ] > > > > > > > > This reverts commit 5a6b4cc5b7a1892a8d7f63d6cbac6e0ae2a9d031. > > > > > > > > It has been queued properly in the akpm tree, this version is just > > > > creating conflicts. > > > > > > Should this be applied to stable trees at all? > > > > > > To me, it occurs to be a revert to avoid conflicts, not to fix something? > > > > Agreed. > > Right, I'll drop it - thank you.
Already committed, I'll go revert this now, thanks. greg k-h
