Hi, On 10/15/07, Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pekka, with a small change to your patch (to handle time-based cache > coherency), your patch worked well and passed all my tests. Thanks. > > So now I wonder if we still need the patch to prevent AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE > from being returned to userland. I guess we still need it, b/c even with > your patch, generic_writepages() can return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE back to > the VFS and we need to ensure that doesn't "leak" outside the kernel.
I wonder whether _not setting_ BDI_CAP_NO_WRITEBACK implies that ->writepage() will never return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE for !wbc->for_reclaim case which would explain why we haven't hit this bug before. Hugh, Andrew? And btw, I think we need to fix ecryptfs too. Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/