On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:01:42AM +0800, Yi Wang wrote: > From: Liao Pingfang <liao.pingf...@zte.com.cn> > > Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc in the error message according to > the previous kzalloc() call.
Looking into the context (atomic!) and error message itself I would rather drop message completely. > Signed-off-by: Liao Pingfang <liao.pingf...@zte.com.cn> > --- > net/atm/lec.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/atm/lec.c b/net/atm/lec.c > index ca37f5a..33033d7 100644 > --- a/net/atm/lec.c > +++ b/net/atm/lec.c > @@ -1537,7 +1537,7 @@ static struct lec_arp_table *make_entry(struct lec_priv > *priv, > > to_return = kzalloc(sizeof(struct lec_arp_table), GFP_ATOMIC); > if (!to_return) { > - pr_info("LEC: Arp entry kmalloc failed\n"); > + pr_info("LEC: Arp entry kzalloc failed\n"); > return NULL; > } > ether_addr_copy(to_return->mac_addr, mac_addr); > -- > 2.9.5 > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko