Hey Viresh,
Thanks for taking time to review the
series :)

On 2020-05-29 15:30, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 28-05-20, 01:51, Sibi Sankar wrote:
Add support to parse optional OPP table attached to the cpu node when
the OPP bandwidth values are populated. This allows for scaling of
DDR/L3 bandwidth levels with frequency change.

Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <[email protected]>
---

V5:
 * Use dev_pm_opp_adjust_voltage instead [Viresh]
 * Misc cleanup

v4:
 * Split fast switch disable into another patch [Lukasz]

drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index fc92a8842e252..fbd73d106a3ae 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/bitfield.h>
 #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/interconnect.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
@@ -31,6 +32,52 @@
 static unsigned long cpu_hw_rate, xo_rate;
 static struct platform_device *global_pdev;

+static int qcom_cpufreq_set_bw(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+                              unsigned long freq_khz)
+{
+       unsigned long freq_hz = freq_khz * 1000;
+       struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
+       struct device *dev;
+       int ret;
+
+       dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
+       if (!dev)
+               return -ENODEV;
+
+       opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(dev, freq_hz, true);
+       if (IS_ERR(opp))
+               return PTR_ERR(opp);
+
+       ret = dev_pm_opp_set_bw(dev, opp);
+       dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
+       return ret;
+}
+
+static int qcom_cpufreq_update_opp(struct device *cpu_dev,
+                                  unsigned long freq_khz,
+                                  unsigned long volt)
+{
+       unsigned long freq_hz = freq_khz * 1000;
+
+       if (dev_pm_opp_adjust_voltage(cpu_dev, freq_hz, volt, volt, volt))
+               return dev_pm_opp_add(cpu_dev, freq_hz, volt);

What's going on here ? Why add OPP here ?

We update the voltage if opp were
initially added as part of
dev_pm_opp_of_add_table. However
if the cpu node does not have an
opp table associated with it, we
do a opp_add_v1 instead.


+
+       /* Enable the opp after voltage update */
+       return dev_pm_opp_enable(cpu_dev, freq_hz);
+}
+
+/* Check for optional interconnect paths on CPU0 */
+static int qcom_cpufreq_find_icc_paths(struct device *dev)
+{
+       struct device *cpu_dev;
+
+       cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(0);
+       if (!cpu_dev)
+               return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+
+       return dev_pm_opp_of_find_icc_paths(cpu_dev, NULL);
+}
+

open code this into the probe routine.

sure


static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
                                        unsigned int index)
 {
@@ -39,6 +86,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,

        writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg);

+       qcom_cpufreq_set_bw(policy, freq);
+
        arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
                            policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
        return 0;
@@ -88,12 +137,30 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
 {
        u32 data, src, lval, i, core_count, prev_freq = 0, freq;
        u32 volt;
+       u64 rate;
        struct cpufreq_frequency_table  *table;
+       struct device_node *opp_table_np, *np;
+       int ret;

        table = kcalloc(LUT_MAX_ENTRIES + 1, sizeof(*table), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!table)
                return -ENOMEM;

+       ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(cpu_dev);
+       if (!ret) {
+               /* Disable all opps and cross-validate against LUT */
+               opp_table_np = dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(cpu_dev);
+               for_each_available_child_of_node(opp_table_np, np) {
+                       ret = of_property_read_u64(np, "opp-hz", &rate);

No way, please use dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() here instead to grab OPPs
one by one.

sure I'll use a dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil
loop to do the same :P


+                       if (!ret)
+                               dev_pm_opp_disable(cpu_dev, rate);
+               }
+               of_node_put(opp_table_np);
+       } else if (ret != -ENODEV) {
+               dev_err(cpu_dev, "Invalid OPP table in Device tree\n");
+               return ret;
+       }

Rather put this in the if (ret) block and so the else part doesn't
need extra indentation.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11573905/

I'll need to enable fast_switch
when the device does not have a
opp-table associated with it or
throw a error when an improper
table is specified. If a table
with bw values is specified, we
disable fast switch and enable
scaling.


+
        for (i = 0; i < LUT_MAX_ENTRIES; i++) {
                data = readl_relaxed(base + REG_FREQ_LUT +
                                      i * LUT_ROW_SIZE);
@@ -112,7 +179,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,

                if (freq != prev_freq && core_count != LUT_TURBO_IND) {
                        table[i].frequency = freq;
-                       dev_pm_opp_add(cpu_dev, freq * 1000, volt);
+                       qcom_cpufreq_update_opp(cpu_dev, freq, volt);
                        dev_dbg(cpu_dev, "index=%d freq=%d, core_count %d\n", i,
                                freq, core_count);
                } else if (core_count == LUT_TURBO_IND) {
@@ -133,7 +200,8 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
                        if (prev->frequency == CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID) {
                                prev->frequency = prev_freq;
                                prev->flags = CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ;
-                               dev_pm_opp_add(cpu_dev, prev_freq * 1000, volt);
+                               qcom_cpufreq_update_opp(cpu_dev, prev_freq,
+                                                       volt);
                        }

                        break;

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Reply via email to