On 5/29/2020 6:11 AM, Stefan Wahren wrote: > Hi Florian, > > Am 28.05.20 um 21:21 schrieb Florian Fainelli: >> The BCM7211 SoC uses the same pinconf_ops as the ones defined for the >> BCM2711 SoC, match the compatible string and use the correct set of >> options. >> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]> >> --- >> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c >> b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c >> index 06bd2b70af3c..e8ad1824c6b3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c >> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c >> @@ -1137,6 +1137,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id >> bcm2835_pinctrl_match[] = { >> .compatible = "brcm,bcm2711-gpio", >> .data = &bcm2711_plat_data, >> }, >> + { >> + .compatible = "brcm,bcm7211-gpio", >> + .data = &bcm2711_pinconf_ops, > > this doesn't look safe. Maybe bcm2711_plat_data? Whoops you are right, I sent an incorrect version. > > Looks like the original patch series based on a older version. Please > double check this still applies since the introduction of 58 GPIO > support for BCM2711. We can use bcm2711_plat_data, thanks Stefan. -- Florian
