Hi Colin... thanks for the patch, I have applied it to the orangefs for-next tree...
-Mike On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 6:48 PM Colin King <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> > > The variable ret is being initialized with a value that is > never read and it is being updated later with a new value. The > initialization is redundant and can be removed. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> > --- > fs/orangefs/orangefs-mod.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/orangefs/orangefs-mod.c b/fs/orangefs/orangefs-mod.c > index c010c1fddafc..289b648ae196 100644 > --- a/fs/orangefs/orangefs-mod.c > +++ b/fs/orangefs/orangefs-mod.c > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(orangefs_request_list_waitq); > > static int __init orangefs_init(void) > { > - int ret = -1; > + int ret; > __u32 i = 0; > > if (op_timeout_secs < 0) > -- > 2.25.1 >
