On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:47:42 +0200 (CEST) Mikulas Patocka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > According to latest memory ordering specification documents from > > Intel and AMD, both manufacturers are committed to in-order loads > > from cacheable memory for the x86 architecture. Hence, smp_rmb() > > may be a simple barrier. > > > > http://developer.intel.com/products/processor/manuals/318147.pdf > > http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/24593.pdf > > Hi > > I'm just wondering about one thing --- what is LFENCE instruction > good for? > > SFENCE is for enforcing ordering in write-combining buffers (it > doesn't have sense in write-back cache mode). > MFENCE is for preventing of moving stores past loads. > > But what is LFENCE for? I read the above documents and they already > say that CPUs have ordered loads. > The cpus also have an explicit set of instructions that deliberately do unordered stores/loads, and s/lfence etc are mostly designed for those. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/