On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 6:52 PM Serge Semin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 06:30:22PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 6:19 PM Serge Semin > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 04:56:21PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 3:26 PM Serge Semin > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Add myself as a maintainer of MIPS CPU and GIC IRQchip, MIPS GIC timer > > > > > and MIPS CPS CPUidle drivers. > > > > ... > > > > > +MIPS CORE DRIVERS > > > > > +M: Serge Semin <[email protected]> > > > > > +L: [email protected] > > > > > +S: Supported > > > > > +F: drivers/bus/mips_cdmm.c > > > > > +F: drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-cpu.c > > > > > +F: drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c > > > > > +F: drivers/clocksource/mips-gic-timer.c > > > > > +F: drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-cps.c > > > > > > > > I think nowadays checkpatch.pl warns on wrong ordering in this data > > > > base. > > > > > > Alas it doesn't. > > > > > Ah, it definitely will. > > it was relatively recently added by: > > commit 9bbce40a4f72fe01a65669aee9f4036baa7fa26e > > Author: Joe Perches <[email protected]> > > Date: Tue May 26 10:36:34 2020 +1000 > > > > checkpatch: additional MAINTAINER section entry ordering checks > > > > > > > Good point though. > > > > You're welcome. > > Next time I won't forget that then. BTW the notes at the top of the > MAINTAINERS > file don't explicitly say about the files-list order. Only about the > whole maintainers list entries order. Seeing the rest of the sub-entries like > L:, M:, etc. aren't ordered then it's probably better to have an explicit > statement, that files should be alphabetically listed, especially when > checkpatch.pl starts warning about that.
Joe, what do you think? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
