From: Matteo Croce <mcr...@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 23ad04669f81f958e9a4121b0266228d2eb3c357 ]

GCC 10 is very strict about symbol clash, and lwt_len_hist_user contains
a symbol which clashes with libbpf:

/usr/bin/ld: samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of 
`bpf_log_buf'; samples/bpf/bpf_load.o:(.bss+0x8c0): first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

bpf_log_buf here seems to be a leftover, so removing it.

Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcr...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200511113234.80722-1-mcr...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c
index 587b68b1f8dd..430a4b7e353e 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c
@@ -15,8 +15,6 @@
 #define MAX_INDEX 64
 #define MAX_STARS 38
 
-char bpf_log_buf[BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE];
-
 static void stars(char *str, long val, long max, int width)
 {
        int i;
-- 
2.25.1



Reply via email to