On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 5:52 AM Maxime Ripard <max...@cerno.tech> wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 09:33:44AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:49 AM Maxime Ripard <max...@cerno.tech> wrote: > > > > > > In order to prevent timeouts and stalls in the pipeline, the core clock > > > needs to be maxed at 500MHz during a modeset on the BCM2711. > > > > Like, the whole system's core clock? > > Yep, unfortunately... > > > How is it reasonable for some device driver to crank the system's core > > clock up and back down to some fixed-in-the-driver frequency? Sounds > > like you need some sort of opp thing here. > > That frequency is the minimum rate of that clock. However, since other > devices have similar requirements (unicam in particular) with different > minimum requirements, we will switch to setting a minimum rate instead > of enforcing a particular rate, so that patch would be essentially > s/clk_set_rate/clk_set_min_rate/.
clk_set_min_rate makes a lot more sense to me. r-b with that obvious change. Thanks!
