On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 22:48, Paul E. McKenney <paul...@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 04:36:33PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > > Instead of __no_kcsan_or_inline, prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test -- > > this is in case we decide to remove __no_kcsan_or_inline. > > > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> > > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <el...@google.com> > > --- > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > This is to prepare eventual removal of __no_kcsan_or_inline, and avoid a > > series that doesn't apply to anything other than -next (because some > > bits are in -tip and the test only in -rcu; although this problem might > > be solved in 2 weeks). This patch is to make sure in case the > > __kcsan_or_inline series is based on -tip, integration in -next doesn't > > cause problems. > > > > This came up in > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200529185923.go706...@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net > > Applied and pushed, thank you! > > Please note that unless you would like this pushed into the current > merge window, it will not be visible in -next until v5.8-rc1 comes out. > Which sounds like you are aware of already, just want to be sure. ;-)
Thank you! Yes, that's fine. The test and this patch I'd expect will go into 5.9 earliest. Thanks, -- Marco
