On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 10:48:18AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 09:38:53PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > That said; noinstr's __no_sanitize combined with atomic_t might be > > 'interesting', because the regular atomic things have explicit > > annotations in them. That should give validation warnings for the right > > .config, I'll have to go try -- so far I've made sure to never enable > > the *SAN stuff. > > --- > Subject: rcu: Fixup noinstr warnings > > A KCSAN build revealed we have explicit annoations through atomic_t > usage, switch to arch_atomic_*() for the respective functions. > > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_nmi_exit()+0x4d: call to > __kcsan_check_access() leaves .noinstr.text section > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_dynticks_eqs_enter()+0x25: call to > __kcsan_check_access() leaves .noinstr.text section > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_nmi_enter()+0x4f: call to > __kcsan_check_access() leaves .noinstr.text section > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_dynticks_eqs_exit()+0x2a: call to > __kcsan_check_access() leaves .noinstr.text section > vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __rcu_is_watching()+0x25: call to > __kcsan_check_access() leaves .noinstr.text section > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
This one does not apply cleanly onto the -rcu tree's "dev" branch, so I am guessing that it is intended to be carried in -tip with yours and Thomas's patch series. If you do instead want this in -rcu, please let me know. Thanx, Paul > --- > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 11 +++++------ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > index c716eadc7617..162656b80db9 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c > @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static noinstr void rcu_dynticks_eqs_enter(void) > * next idle sojourn. > */ > rcu_dynticks_task_trace_enter(); // Before ->dynticks update! > - seq = atomic_add_return(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR, &rdp->dynticks); > + seq = arch_atomic_add_return(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR, &rdp->dynticks); > // RCU is no longer watching. Better be in extended quiescent state! > WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG) && > (seq & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR)); > @@ -274,13 +274,13 @@ static noinstr void rcu_dynticks_eqs_exit(void) > * and we also must force ordering with the next RCU read-side > * critical section. > */ > - seq = atomic_add_return(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR, &rdp->dynticks); > + seq = arch_atomic_add_return(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR, &rdp->dynticks); > // RCU is now watching. Better not be in an extended quiescent state! > rcu_dynticks_task_trace_exit(); // After ->dynticks update! > WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG) && > !(seq & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR)); > if (seq & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_MASK) { > - atomic_andnot(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_MASK, &rdp->dynticks); > + arch_atomic_andnot(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_MASK, &rdp->dynticks); > smp_mb__after_atomic(); /* _exit after clearing mask. */ > } > } > @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static __always_inline bool > rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void) > { > struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data); > > - return !(atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks) & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR); > + return !(arch_atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks) & RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR); > } > > /* > @@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ noinstr void rcu_nmi_exit(void) > { > struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data); > > + instrumentation_begin(); > /* > * Check for ->dynticks_nmi_nesting underflow and bad ->dynticks. > * (We are exiting an NMI handler, so RCU better be paying attention > @@ -705,7 +706,6 @@ noinstr void rcu_nmi_exit(void) > * leave it in non-RCU-idle state. > */ > if (rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting != 1) { > - instrumentation_begin(); > trace_rcu_dyntick(TPS("--="), rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, > rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting - 2, > atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks)); > WRITE_ONCE(rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, /* No store tearing. */ > @@ -714,7 +714,6 @@ noinstr void rcu_nmi_exit(void) > return; > } > > - instrumentation_begin(); > /* This NMI interrupted an RCU-idle CPU, restore RCU-idleness. */ > trace_rcu_dyntick(TPS("Startirq"), rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, 0, > atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks)); > WRITE_ONCE(rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, 0); /* Avoid store tearing. */