On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 05:25:15PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Sun, 17 May 2020 22:49:44 -0400
> Yan Zhao <yan.y.z...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > This allows a simpler VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO ioctl in vendor driver
> >
> > Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.z...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h | 2 ++
> > include/linux/vfio.h | 3 +++
> > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > index 290b7ab55ecf..30137c1c5308 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > @@ -105,6 +105,24 @@ void *vfio_pci_vendor_data(void *device_data)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_vendor_data);
> >
> > +int vfio_pci_set_vendor_regions(void *device_data, int num_vendor_regions)
> > +{
> > + struct vfio_pci_device *vdev = device_data;
> > +
> > + vdev->num_vendor_regions = num_vendor_regions;
>
> Do we need any kind of sanity check here, in case this is called with a
> bogus value?
>
you are right. it at least needs to be >=0.
maybe type of "unsigned int" is more appropriate for num_vendor_regions.
we don't need to check its max value as QEMU would check it.
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_set_vendor_regions);
> > +
> > +
> > +int vfio_pci_set_vendor_irqs(void *device_data, int num_vendor_irqs)
> > +{
> > + struct vfio_pci_device *vdev = device_data;
> > +
> > + vdev->num_vendor_irqs = num_vendor_irqs;
>
> Here as well.
yes. will change the type to "unsigned int".
Thank you for kindly reviewing:)
Yan
>
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_set_vendor_irqs);
> > /*
> > * Our VGA arbiter participation is limited since we don't know anything
> > * about the device itself. However, if the device is the only VGA device
>
> (...)
>
