Hi Kamil,

On v2 patches it s usual to add a changelog (could be small) to help
keep track of what changed.

On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 16:59 +0200, Kamil Domański wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kamil Domański <ka...@domanski.co>

*snip*

> +/**
> + * hidpp20_adc_map_status_voltage() - convert HID++ code to power supply 
> status
> + * @hidpp: HID++ device struct.
> + * @data: ADC report data.
> + * @voltage: Pointer to variable where the ADC voltage shall be written.
> + *
> + * This function decodes the ADC voltage and charge status
> + * of the device's battery.
> + *
> + * Return: Returns the power supply charge status code.
> + */
> +static int hidpp20_adc_map_status_voltage(struct hidpp_device *hidpp,
> +                                             u8 data[3], int *voltage)
> +{
> +     bool isConnected;
> +     bool isCharging;
> +     bool chargingComplete;
> +     bool chargingFault;

From my initial comments:

> We use snake case.

> +
> +     long flags = (long) data[2];

> Use u8 instead. Why are we even using a variable for this?

My main point here is that long means different things in different
architectures, and we only want one byte so I would go for u8.

> +
> +     *voltage = get_unaligned_be16(data);
> +     isConnected = test_bit(0, &flags);
> +     isCharging = test_bit(1, &flags);
> +     chargingComplete = test_bit(2, &flags);
> +     chargingFault = test_bit(3, &flags);

> I don't think this is needed, just do it in the ifs directly.
>
> Here I would add a #define for each bit:
>
> #define FLAG_ADC_MAP_STATUS_CONNECTED 0
> ...
> if (data[2] & FLAG_ADC_MAP_STATUS_CONNECTED)

> +
> +     if (!isConnected)
> +             return POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_UNKNOWN;
> +
> +     if (isCharging) {
> +             if (chargingFault)
> +                     return POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_NOT_CHARGING;
> +
> +             if (chargingComplete)
> +                     return POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_FULL;
> +
> +             return POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_CHARGING;
> +     }
> +
> +     return POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_DISCHARGING;
> +}

The algorithm is now correct, thanks!

*snip*

> @@ -3994,6 +4190,8 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hidpp_devices[] = {
>  
>       { /* Logitech G403 Wireless Gaming Mouse over USB */
>         HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, 0xC082) },
> +     { /* Logitech G533 Wireless Headset over USB */
> +       HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, 0x0A66) },
>       { /* Logitech G703 Gaming Mouse over USB */
>         HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_LOGITECH, 0xC087) },
>       { /* Logitech G703 Hero Gaming Mouse over USB */

Same thing here. We should see if the device supports the DJ protocol
and add it in hid-logitech-dj instead.

Most of my comments here are nitpicks, I am not sure how strict
Benjamin/Jiri are about that.

Cheers,
Filipe Laíns

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to