On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:29:22AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 08:55:55PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > > Possibly a bug in lib/radix-tree.c? this_cpu_ptr() in > > radix_tree_node_alloc() > > can be reached without a prior preempt_disable(). Or is the caller of > > idr_alloc() doing something wrong? > > Yes, the idr_alloc() call is plainly wrong: > > mutex_lock(&qrtr_port_lock); > if (!*port) { > rc = idr_alloc(&qrtr_ports, ipc, > QRTR_MIN_EPH_SOCKET, QRTR_MAX_EPH_SOCKET + 1, > GFP_ATOMIC); > > If we can take a mutex lock, there's no excuse to be using GFP_ATOMIC. > That (and the call slightly lower in the function) should be GFP_KERNEL > as the minimal fix (below). I'll send a followup patch which converts > this IDR to the XArray instead.
I did see that the GFP_ATOMIC was unnecessary, but it wasn't obvious to me that it was actually *wrong*. Shouldn't this requirement be documented for the @gfp argument to idr_alloc()? - Eric