3.16.85-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
commit fbbbbd2f28aec991f3fbc248df211550fbdfd58c upstream.
There are two cases where u32 variables n and err are being checked
for less than zero error values, the checks is always false because
the variables are not signed. Fix this by making the variables ints.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0")
Fixes: 345c0dbf3a30 ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using
block_validity")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
@@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static int ext4_protect_reserved_inode(s
struct inode *inode;
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
struct ext4_map_blocks map;
- u32 i = 0, err = 0, num, n;
+ u32 i = 0, num;
+ int err = 0, n;
if ((ino < EXT4_ROOT_INO) ||
(ino > le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_inodes_count)))
