Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What I meant was: First revisions may have had incomplete OHCI 1.1 > support and were sold as OHCI 1.0 chips, and as soon as they stabilized > it they sold them as OHCI 1.1 chips. But that's mere speculation on my > part. I can't think of any other reason though why anybody would hide > OHCI 1.1 compatibility.
Perhaps some MS Windows had troubles with 1.1? VIA has a history of similar things (e.g. some C3 CPUs). All 3 chips I have, including that dated 2002, are single revision "80" so I guess there are absolutely no silicon changes. > And are you going to test if and how stable OHCI 1.1 features work? > (Which features are these? Right now only dual buffer reception comes > to my mind.) On this old EPIA? No :-) At least unless I have any doubt. On the other machine (currently) 1.0? Sure, that's why I did it. Is the "dual buffer reception" involved in receiving video from a DV camera, using the new driver? -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
