Arnd, On Wed, 10 Jun 2020, Rob Herring wrote:
> Using 'syscon' alone should be avoided as compatible strings should be > specific enough to identify the exact set of registers contained. Update > the schema to ensure at least 2 compatible strings are present. I'm assuming you're okay with this? > Cc: Lee Jones <[email protected]> > Cc: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]> > --- > FYI, there's 43 cases of this on arm32 in my testing. > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml > index 19bdaf781853..af7a68051392 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/syscon.yaml > @@ -43,7 +43,8 @@ properties: > > - contains: > const: syscon > - additionalItems: true > + minItems: 2 > + maxItems: 4 # Should be enough > > reg: > maxItems: 1 -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
